HC has Kangana Ranaut’s passport renewal application


The Bombay High Court ruled Monday on actor Kangana Ranaut’s plea for renewal of his passport, after the Passport Authority lawyer gave assurances he would rule on his application within as fast as we can.

The Passport Authority lawyer asked Ranaut to declare that no criminal case was pending against her in any court, which she did. Although Ranuat is named in two FIRs, no legal proceedings are pending in either case, her lawyer said.

A division bench of Judge SS Shinde and Judge Revati Mohite-Dere heard Ranaut’s interim claims filed through attorney Rizwan Siddiquee, arguing that she had to travel overseas for the Dhaakad shooting , but the renewal of her passport, which is due to expire in September, has been delayed by police complaints against her.

As of October 2020, Bandra Police had registered an FIR against Ranaut and his sister Rangoli Chandel under Articles 153A of the IPC (promoting enmity between different groups on the grounds of religion, race, etc.), 295A (deliberate acts offending religious feelings) and 124-A (sedition) following a series of controversial statements made by the duo on social media.

In March of this year, Khar police charged Kangana, Rangoli, their brother Akshat Ranaut and a person named Kamal Kumar Jain of allegedly announcing a film about Kashmiri ruler Didda without the knowledge of the plaintiff Ashish Kaul. , author of Didda: The Warrior Queen of Kashmir. . Kaul claims to have the exclusive copyright in Didda’s story.

On Monday, Additional Solicitor General Anil Singh, on instructions from the Passport Authority, argued that Ranaut’s renewal application mentioned incorrect details, saying criminal proceedings were pending against her while only FIR had been registered.

Singh added that if Ranaut’s lawyer is prepared to state that no criminal case is pending against her and makes corrections to the pending application before the Authority, he is ready to consider the same quickly.

Subsequently, lawyer Siddiquee for Ranaut argued that no criminal case was pending against her in court because of the two FIRs. The court accepted the statement, ruled on the provisional claims, and issued a new hearing into Ranaut’s challenge against the two FIRs for July 9.

Source link

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.